6月28日，QS 教育集团正式分布2024 QS世界大学排名。为了及时反映出高等教育发展的最新趋势，有三个新增指标纳入了今年的QS排名的考量中，分别是 可持续性、就业能力以及国际研究网络。该排名涵盖来自104个国家或地区的1500所大学，排名是基于对1750多万篇学术论文以及超过24万名学术教职员工和雇主的专业意见分析而得出。

中国
中国内地共有71所学校上榜，与去年相同。在中国参评的高校中，清华大学、浙江大学、复旦大学、上海交通大学分别位列全球第25位、第44位、第50位、第51位，共有上述5所中国高校进入全球Top100。
美国
麻省理工学院连续十二年排名第一，剑桥大学和牛津大学分列第二和第三位。加州大学伯克利分校首次跻身世界前十，从去年的第27名上升至第10名。
新加坡
新加坡国立大学首次跻身世界前十，从去年的第11名上升至第8名。
英国
英国高校的排名整体变化不大， 剑桥大学和帝国理工大学依旧保持着世界第二和世界第六，而牛津大学超越斯坦福大学排名位于世界第三；伦敦大学学院则从去年的第八名下降至今年的第九名。

又是CMU上面的。如下：

While few provide the broad coverage and interdisciplinary environment found in EPP, there are a number of other academic programs at other North American universities that overlap parts of EPP. They vary considerably in their relative emphasis on engineering; the natural, health or social sciences; and management and policy.

Boston University; Center for Law and Technology (School of Law)

University of British Columbia; Community & Regional Planning

University of California, Berkeley; Energy and Resources Group, (ERG)

Clark University; Center for Technology, Environment, and Development (CENTED); and the George Perkins March Institute

Clarkson University, Environmental Manufacturing Management (EVMM)

Columbia University; Center for Environmental Research and Conservation

Cornell University; Science and Technology Studies; Department of Natural Resources

Drexel University; Environmental Science, Engineering, & Policy

Duke University; Nicholas School of the Environment

Georgia Institute of Technology; School of Public Policy

George Mason University; Department of Public Affairs

George Mason University; Environmental Science and Public Policy

Harvard University; Environmental Science and Risk Management (School of Public Health); Kennedy School of Government

Indiana University; School of Public and Environmental Affairs

Johns Hopkins University; Risk Sciences and Public Policy Institute (School of Hygiene and Public Health); Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering

Louisiana State University, Institute for Environmental Studies

Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Technology and Policy Program; and Engineering Systems Division

McMaster University, Engineering and Public Policy

University of Michigan; School of Natural Resources; School of Public Health

Michigan State University, Risk Management/Risk Assessment Program, and Department of Environmental Engineering

Michigan Technological University; Environmental Policy Program

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Environmental Management Policy

University of North Carolina; Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering

North Carolina State University, Department of Civil Engineering

University of Oklahoma, Science and Public Policy Program

University of Pennsylvania; Department of Decision Science (Wharton School)

University of Pittsburgh; Information Science Department

Princeton University; Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs; Center for Energy and Environmental Studies

Rutgers University; Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute; Center for Risk Communication

Stanford University; Department of Management Science and Engineering

University of Texas; LBJ School of Public Affairs

University of Toronto; Institute for Environmental Studies

University of Virginia; Department of Systems Engineering

Washington University, St. Louis; Engineering and Policy

University of Washington; School of Public Health

University of Waterloo, Department of Management

Outside of North America, the following programs have activities that overlap EPP.

Paris School of Mining

Sussex University, Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), United Kingdom

The Technical University of Delft, SEPA (Systems Engineering, Policy Analysis and Management), Technology Policy and Management, The Netherlands

The Technical University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands

School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom

University of Cambridge, Judge Institute of Management (MPhil in Technology Policy), United Kingdom

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMPUTATIONAL FINANCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING?

While the terms "quantitative finance," "computational finance," "mathematical finance," and "financial engineering" are often used interchangeably, there exist relevant, subtle differences in their meanings. Financial engineering programs often emphasize finance and financial markets at the expense of more rigorous computing and quantitative skills. Some mathematical finance programs focus on theoretical math at the expense of real-world application. Few programs embed programming into their curricula and fewer still have been able to replicate Carnegie Mellon's well-balanced and carefully coordinated mix of math, probability, applied finance and computation.

Not all financial engineering degrees deliver the same value! We often advise students evaluating programs to ask the following key questions:

1. The skills needed for the quantitative finance industry are, by definition, interdisciplinary. Is the program isolated in one department or top-heavy in math or finance?

2. Will you benefit from a customized curriculum that is designed specifically for the jobs and careers of interest to you?

3. Does the program offer knowledgeable career counselors who will work closely with you and with interested recruiters in helping you obtain your career goals?

4. Will you enjoy a program with many years of experience in developing its curriculum and overall student experience?

5. Will you be participating in a program with a large alumni network and which is committed to a strong alumni ties?

2）

I would like to reapply to a graduate program; can I use my old application materials?

Completed applications may be reconsidered once for the semester immediately after the original application semester (e.g. applied for the Fall, reconsider for the following Spring). The recorsideration is not done automatically but requires a requesting email message to the Graduate Program Administrator. The applicant may send updated information such as new test scores to enhance the application.

3）

You will need to complete a new application and pay the application fee in order to apply the second time.

来自卡耐基梅隆大学

LZ本来申的16fall，本来动出国的念头就晚，抱着侥幸的心理，试了试。结果果然悲剧了，打算今年好好准备，再战。我想问，今年再申同一所学校会不会难度更大了，需要怎么做，申请程序什么的还是一样吗？

如题，有些课程只有ABCD评级，想问问这种情况大家是怎么处理的。问了教务处，我们学校不给算GPA的。

临近毕业季，不少大学生要离开校园的怀抱而成为社会人士了~美国WalletHub网站将今年最热门的入门职业进行了排名，同时也列举了今年最坑爹的入门职业，毕业生们赶紧来参考参考！

最受欢迎的入门职业：

1. 工程师

平均工资：62900刀

找到此工作难度：★★★★★

事业前途排名：25

工作危险程度排名：38

2. 系统工程师

平均工资：66550刀

找到此工作难度：★★★

事业前途排名：60

工作危险程度排名：38

3. 安全代表

平均工资：56750刀

找到此工作难度：★

事业前途排名：67

工作危险程度排名：56

4. APP开发人员

平均工资：55950刀

找到此工作难度：★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

事业前途排名：13

工作危险程度排名：18

5. 环境、健康与安全工程师

平均工资：54500刀

找到此工作难度：★★★★★★★★★★

事业前途排名：43

工作危险程度排名：38

6. 电子工程师

平均工资：65600刀

找到此工作难度：★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

事业前途排名：23

工作危险程度排名：36

7. 安全员

平均工资：39750刀

找到此工作难度：★★★★★★

事业前途排名：38

工作危险程度排名：61

8. 软件工程师

平均工资：63550刀

找到此工作难度：★★★★

事业前途排名：26

工作危险程度排名：79

9. 培训师

平均工资：48700刀

找到此工作难度：★★

事业前途排名：42

工作危险程度排名：80

10. 建筑师

平均工资：72650刀

找到此工作难度：★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

事业前途排名：15

工作危险程度排名：57

最坑爹的入门职业：

1. 钻井工

2. 机械工

3. 紧急电话接线员

4. 汽车修理工

5. 模具生产工

6. 木匠

7. 锅炉制造工

8. 水管工

9. 地板装配工

10. 焊接工

一眼看过去，那些最受欢迎的都是XX师（好多工程师啊~），这些工作要么高薪，要么安全，要么有前途。而最坑爹的工作都是XX工，前者技术活，后者体力活。。虽然没有具体数据，不过估计薪水不高，很多工作内容也不怎么安全，也难怪被评为最坑的了。。

如题，土木工程结构方向

个人比较喜欢澳洲，美国我这成绩可以申请到啥档次的学校

RT

已经过了A校的签证，但是后来拿到B校的offer。很想去B校，现在要火速重签，但是很怕被拒就两边落空了。求问，会有这个风险吗？

如果GPA高的话，是不是也有优势？二本学校的GPA认吗？

GT现在都还没报名，什么时候考出来会比较有利呢？

RT.

信息科学，拿到康奈尔大学的MPS和密歇根安娜堡的MS的AD。不知该如何抉择。康奈尔学校名气大，课堂小，大概20来人。但感觉MPS就不像一个正儿八经的硕士项目，也只有1年的时间，感觉学不到啥东西。密歇根是MS，专业招的人也多，100多号吧，课程也挺好。想去密歇根，但又舍不了康奈尔Ivy的牌子。小女子跪求意见。

186签证是TR还是PR？

本人想去美国读本科，但不知道读什么专业。想学工程类的，但是是女生并且对数学和物理兴趣不是很大（不过成绩还不错）。